SenseNova 6.7 flash lite
A lower-table result with a few useful bright spots: 33/151 tasks solved at least once, 13/151 solved in all three attempts, with the clearest wins around automation and configuration-management work plus localized Go security-scanner changes. 这是一个排名靠后但仍有局部亮点的结果：151 题中至少一次解出 33 题，三次都解出 13 题；强项主要落在自动化和配置管理类改动以及边界相对清楚的 Go 漏洞扫描器改动。
How to read this result可以这样读
- SenseNova 6.7 flash lite is best read as volatile explorer: rank #29, 33 reached tasks, 13 stable solves.SenseNova 6.7 flash lite 更适合读成探索型但波动较大：排名 #29，触达 33 题，稳定解出 13 题。
- Best suite signal: Ansible · release 002 at 7/10 (70.0%).最强 suite 信号：Ansible 自动化 · release 002，7/10（70.0%）。
- Weakest visible area: Open Library · release 014 at 0/10 (0.0%).最弱可见区域：Open Library · release 014，0/10（0.0%）。
- Because the agent shell is OpenCode, the result mostly exposes the underlying model's planning habits rather than a heavily opinionated workflow.因为 agent shell 是 OpenCode，这个结果更直接暴露底层模型的规划习惯，而不是强工作流包装后的表现。
SenseNova 6.7 flash lite is a volatile explorer row around the #29 slot. The useful reading is not just the 23.14 score, but the split between 33 reached tasks and 13 stable solves.
The closest family reference is KAT Coder Pro v2 at rank #28. Compared with that row, this one is 0.33 points behind, with 4 more reached tasks and 4 fewer stable solves.
The result is easiest to understand as a three-point shape: volume at Ansible · release 002 at 7/10 (70.0%), efficiency at vuls · release 012 at 3/4 (75.0%), and resistance at Open Library · release 014 at 0/10 (0.0%). Because the agent shell is OpenCode, the result mostly exposes the underlying model’s planning habits rather than a heavily opinionated workflow.
Do not read the chart as a small version of the top rows. It is a map of early failure surfaces with a few recoverable pockets.
At this rank, Unify validation in add_book by removing override, with the sole exception of 'promise items' matters as much as the wins. It shows the task shape where the model-agent loop fails before it can produce a meaningful verifier-backed patch.
The verifier audit keeps 68/68 solved attempts for SenseNova 6.7 flash lite, so the interesting question is not score inflation; it is where the model repeatedly finds the same kind of patch.
The available audit keeps 68 of 68 initial solved attempts. Read this as a robustness check, especially when the audit sample is smaller than 453 attempts.当前可用复核保留了 68 次初始成功中的 68 次。这更适合作为稳健性检查，特别是在复核样本小于 453 次尝试时。
This row is more useful as a failure map than as a default choice. Look at Open Library · release 014 at 0/10 (0.0%) first: it shows the task shape where the loop loses traction. With 68/453 solved attempts, the page is most useful for seeing where the agent loop breaks before it becomes a dependable option.
Supporting suite table
| Suite | Repo | Solved | Pass^3 | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
release-zh-012-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 3/4 | 2 | 75.0% |
release-zh-002-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 7/10 | 3 | 70.0% |
release-zh-003-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 4/10 | 3 | 40.0% |
release-zh-010-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 4/10 | 1 | 40.0% |
release-zh-004-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 1/3 | 1 | 33.3% |
release-zh-001-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 3/10 | 1 | 30.0% |
release-zh-014-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-015-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-018-qutebrowser-qutebrowser |
qutebrowser/qutebrowser | 0/9 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-016-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/5 | 0 | 0.0% |
SenseNova 6.7 flash lite 是一个排名 #29 附近的探索型但波动较大结果。它的重点不只是 23.14 分，而是 33 道触达题和 13 道稳定题之间的差距。
最接近的同系参照是排名 #28 的 KAT Coder Pro v2。和它相比，这一行最终分低 0.33 分，触达题多 4 个，稳定题少 4 个。
这个结果最容易读成三点形状：数量在Ansible 自动化 · release 002，7/10（70.0%），效率在vuls 漏洞扫描器 · release 012，3/4（75.0%），阻力在Open Library · release 014，0/10（0.0%）。因为 agent shell 是 OpenCode，这个结果更直接暴露底层模型的规划习惯，而不是强工作流包装后的表现。
不要把这张图读成头部模型的小号版本。它更像早期失败面的地图，中间夹着少数可恢复区域。
在这个排名段，在 add_book 中通过移除 override 来统一验证，唯一例外是 promise items 和成功案例一样重要。它说明模型-agent 循环在哪种任务形态上还没形成有效 verifier-backed patch。
SenseNova 6.7 flash lite 的复核保留了 68 次成功中的 68 次，所以重点不是分数膨胀，而是模型在哪些地方能反复找到同类补丁。
The available audit keeps 68 of 68 initial solved attempts. Read this as a robustness check, especially when the audit sample is smaller than 453 attempts.当前可用复核保留了 68 次初始成功中的 68 次。这更适合作为稳健性检查，特别是在复核样本小于 453 次尝试时。
这一行更适合作为失败地图，而不是默认选择。先看Open Library · release 014，0/10（0.0%）：它展示了模型-agent 循环最容易失去抓手的任务形态。在 453 次尝试中只成功 68 次时，这页最有价值的是看 agent loop 在哪里先断掉。
支撑这个判断的 suite 表
| Suite | Repo | 解出 | Pass^3 | 通过率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
release-zh-012-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 3/4 | 2 | 75.0% |
release-zh-002-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 7/10 | 3 | 70.0% |
release-zh-003-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 4/10 | 3 | 40.0% |
release-zh-010-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 4/10 | 1 | 40.0% |
release-zh-004-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 1/3 | 1 | 33.3% |
release-zh-001-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 3/10 | 1 | 30.0% |
release-zh-014-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-015-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-018-qutebrowser-qutebrowser |
qutebrowser/qutebrowser | 0/9 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-016-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/5 | 0 | 0.0% |