MiMo v2.5
A lower-table result with a few useful bright spots: 33/151 tasks solved at least once, 18/151 solved in all three attempts, with the clearest wins around automation and configuration-management work plus localized Go security-scanner changes. 这是一个排名靠后但仍有局部亮点的结果：151 题中至少一次解出 33 题，三次都解出 18 题；强项主要落在自动化和配置管理类改动以及边界相对清楚的 Go 漏洞扫描器改动。
How to read this result可以这样读
- MiMo v2.5 is best read as moderately stable: rank #24, 33 reached tasks, 18 stable solves.MiMo v2.5 更适合读成中等稳定型：排名 #24，触达 33 题，稳定解出 18 题。
- Best suite signal: Ansible · release 002 at 7/10 (70.0%).最强 suite 信号：Ansible 自动化 · release 002，7/10（70.0%）。
- Weakest visible area: Open Library · release 014 at 0/10 (0.0%).最弱可见区域：Open Library · release 014，0/10（0.0%）。
- Because the agent shell is OpenCode, the result mostly exposes the underlying model's planning habits rather than a heavily opinionated workflow.因为 agent shell 是 OpenCode，这个结果更直接暴露底层模型的规划习惯，而不是强工作流包装后的表现。
MiMo v2.5 is a moderately stable row around the #24 slot. The useful reading is not just the 25.24 score, but the split between 33 reached tasks and 18 stable solves.
The closest family reference is MiMo v2.5 pro at rank #12. Compared with that row, this one is 5.45 points behind, with 11 fewer reached tasks and 7 fewer stable solves.
The suite split is asymmetric: Ansible · release 002 at 7/10 (70.0%) supplies the main body of wins, vuls · release 012 at 3/4 (75.0%) supplies the clean spike, and Open Library · release 014 at 0/10 (0.0%) is where that pattern stops. Because the agent shell is OpenCode, the result mostly exposes the underlying model’s planning habits rather than a heavily opinionated workflow.
The chart is not trying to crown a single strength; it shows how quickly the row falls from Ansible · release 002 at 7/10 (70.0%) to Open Library · release 014 at 0/10 (0.0%).
The examples keep the middle-band story honest: Introduce public methods to access PlayIterator._host_states is the upside, Add Reading-Log Counts to Solr Work Documents is the failure surface, and the page should be read between those two poles.
The audit changes how to read MiMo v2.5: only 60% of initial solved attempts survive, with 31 rejected attempts, while the exported score field stays flat. Treat the wins as leads that need stricter confirmation.
The available audit keeps 47 of 78 initial solved attempts. Read this as a robustness check, especially when the audit sample is smaller than 453 attempts.当前可用复核保留了 78 次初始成功中的 47 次。这更适合作为稳健性检查，特别是在复核样本小于 453 次尝试时。
In practice, read it through the gap between Ansible · release 002 at 7/10 (70.0%) and Open Library · release 014 at 0/10 (0.0%). That gap is more actionable than the rank because it says which repo shape gets coherent patches. The 78/453 attempt score is the backdrop; the article above is about which parts of that score are repeatable enough to matter.
Supporting suite table
| Suite | Repo | Solved | Pass^3 | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
release-zh-012-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 3/4 | 2 | 75.0% |
release-zh-002-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 7/10 | 2 | 70.0% |
release-zh-003-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 6/10 | 4 | 60.0% |
release-zh-004-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 1/3 | 1 | 33.3% |
release-zh-001-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 3/10 | 2 | 30.0% |
release-zh-010-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 3/10 | 2 | 30.0% |
release-zh-014-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-015-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-018-qutebrowser-qutebrowser |
qutebrowser/qutebrowser | 0/9 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-016-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/5 | 0 | 0.0% |
MiMo v2.5 是一个排名 #24 附近的中等稳定型结果。它的重点不只是 25.24 分，而是 33 道触达题和 18 道稳定题之间的差距。
最接近的同系参照是排名 #12 的 MiMo v2.5 pro。和它相比，这一行最终分低 5.45 分，触达题少 11 个，稳定题少 7 个。
suite 分布是不对称的：Ansible 自动化 · release 002，7/10（70.0%）贡献主要胜利，vuls 漏洞扫描器 · release 012，3/4（75.0%）贡献最干净高点，而Open Library · release 014，0/10（0.0%）标出这种模式停止的地方。因为 agent shell 是 OpenCode，这个结果更直接暴露底层模型的规划习惯，而不是强工作流包装后的表现。
这张图不是为了给单一强项加冕，而是展示这一行从Ansible 自动化 · release 002，7/10（70.0%）滑到Open Library · release 014，0/10（0.0%）有多快。
这些案例让中段模型画像更具体：引入公共方法以访问 PlayIterator._host_states 是上限，向 Solr Work Documents 添加 Reading-Log Counts 是失败面，这页应该在两者之间读。
复核改变了 MiMo v2.5 的读法：初始成功只有 60% 保留下来，31 次被剔除，但当前导出的分数字段没有变化。原始胜利更适合作为线索，需要更严格确认。
The available audit keeps 47 of 78 initial solved attempts. Read this as a robustness check, especially when the audit sample is smaller than 453 attempts.当前可用复核保留了 78 次初始成功中的 47 次。这更适合作为稳健性检查，特别是在复核样本小于 453 次尝试时。
实际选择时，更应该通过Ansible 自动化 · release 002，7/10（70.0%）和Open Library · release 014，0/10（0.0%）之间的落差来读它。这个落差比分数排名更可操作，因为它说明哪类代码库更容易得到连贯补丁。78/453 的单次尝试成功数只是背景；上面的文章重点是哪些部分足够可重复、值得当成能力看。
支撑这个判断的 suite 表
| Suite | Repo | 解出 | Pass^3 | 通过率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
release-zh-012-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 3/4 | 2 | 75.0% |
release-zh-002-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 7/10 | 2 | 70.0% |
release-zh-003-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 6/10 | 4 | 60.0% |
release-zh-004-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 1/3 | 1 | 33.3% |
release-zh-001-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 3/10 | 2 | 30.0% |
release-zh-010-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 3/10 | 2 | 30.0% |
release-zh-014-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-015-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-018-qutebrowser-qutebrowser |
qutebrowser/qutebrowser | 0/9 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-016-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 0/5 | 0 | 0.0% |