DeepSeek v4 flash (max)
A lower-table result with a few useful bright spots: 15/151 tasks solved at least once, 11/151 solved in all three attempts, with the clearest wins around automation and configuration-management work plus Go product plumbing across configuration, storage, and service APIs. 这是一个排名靠后但仍有局部亮点的结果：151 题中至少一次解出 15 题，三次都解出 11 题；强项主要落在自动化和配置管理类改动以及横跨配置、存储和服务 API 的 Go 产品工程。
How to read this result可以这样读
- DeepSeek v4 flash (max) is best read as narrow but repeatable: rank #32, 15 reached tasks, 11 stable solves.DeepSeek v4 flash (max) 更适合读成覆盖窄但命中后较稳定：排名 #32，触达 15 题，稳定解出 11 题。
- Best suite signal: Ansible · release 003 at 4/10 (40.0%).最强 suite 信号：Ansible 自动化 · release 003，4/10（40.0%）。
- Weakest visible area: Flipt · release 005 at 0/10 (0.0%).最弱可见区域：Flipt feature flag 服务 · release 005，0/10（0.0%）。
- The deepseek-tui result is partly a shell-integration test; the low coverage matters as much as the model score itself.deepseek-tui 结果有一部分是在测试 shell 集成；低覆盖本身和模型分数一样值得注意。
DeepSeek v4 flash (max) is a narrow but repeatable result. It reaches only 15/151 tasks, but 11 of those are stable 3/3 solves, so the successes are less random than the rank suggests.
The closest family reference is DeepSeek v4 pro (max) at rank #7. Compared with that row, this one is 16.73 points behind, with 33 fewer reached tasks and 17 fewer stable solves.
Most of the positive signal concentrates in Ansible · release 003 at 4/10 (40.0%). The opposing read is Flipt · release 005 at 0/10 (0.0%), which keeps the row from looking like a generalist. The deepseek-tui result is partly a shell-integration test; the low coverage matters as much as the model score itself.
Read the bars as a small island map. There are not many islands, but the ones that appear are less noisy than the rank alone suggests.
The case strip is small but revealing: TypeError combining VarsWithSources and dict in combine_vars is the kind of island this row can hold, while iptables chain creation does not behave like the command (ansible/ansible · solved 0/3) marks where the island ends.
The audit changes how to read DeepSeek v4 flash (max): only 63% of initial solved attempts survive, with 14 rejected attempts, while the exported score field stays flat. Treat the wins as leads that need stricter confirmation.
The available audit keeps 24 of 38 initial solved attempts. Read this as a robustness check, especially when the audit sample is smaller than 453 attempts.当前可用复核保留了 38 次初始成功中的 24 次。这更适合作为稳健性检查，特别是在复核样本小于 453 次尝试时。
Treat it as a narrow specialist. The wins around Ansible · release 003 at 4/10 (40.0%) are real, but the page does not support extrapolating that behavior into Flipt · release 005 at 0/10 (0.0%). The 38/453 attempt score is low in absolute terms, but the stable subset is coherent enough to be worth separating from the misses.
Supporting suite table
| Suite | Repo | Solved | Pass^3 | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
release-zh-003-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 4/10 | 4 | 40.0% |
release-zh-007-flipt-io-flipt |
flipt-io/flipt | 4/10 | 2 | 40.0% |
release-zh-004-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 1/3 | 1 | 33.3% |
release-zh-001-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 2/10 | 1 | 20.0% |
release-zh-016-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 1/5 | 1 | 20.0% |
release-zh-002-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 1/10 | 1 | 10.0% |
release-zh-005-flipt-io-flipt |
flipt-io/flipt | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-008-flipt-io-flipt |
flipt-io/flipt | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-010-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-011-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
DeepSeek v4 flash (max) 更像一个覆盖窄但命中后较稳定的结果。它只覆盖到 15/151 题，但其中 11 题是 3/3 稳定通过，所以成功并不完全是偶然命中。
最接近的同系参照是排名 #7 的 DeepSeek v4 pro (max)。和它相比，这一行最终分低 16.73 分，触达题少 33 个，稳定题少 17 个。
正面信号大多集中在Ansible 自动化 · release 003，4/10（40.0%）。反向读法是Flipt feature flag 服务 · release 005，0/10（0.0%），它让这一行看起来不像通用型。deepseek-tui 结果有一部分是在测试 shell 集成；低覆盖本身和模型分数一样值得注意。
这张图更像一张小岛地图：岛不多，但出现的那些并不只是随机噪声，不能只按低排名理解。
案例条虽然窄，但很有信息量：combine_vars 中组合 VarsWithSources 和 dict 时出现 TypeError 是这一行守得住的小岛，而 iptables chain creation 的行为与命令行 iptables -N 不一致（ansible/ansible · 3 次中成功 0 次）标出了边界。
复核改变了 DeepSeek v4 flash (max) 的读法：初始成功只有 63% 保留下来，14 次被剔除，但当前导出的分数字段没有变化。原始胜利更适合作为线索，需要更严格确认。
The available audit keeps 24 of 38 initial solved attempts. Read this as a robustness check, especially when the audit sample is smaller than 453 attempts.当前可用复核保留了 38 次初始成功中的 24 次。这更适合作为稳健性检查，特别是在复核样本小于 453 次尝试时。
更适合把它当窄域专门型。Ansible 自动化 · release 003，4/10（40.0%）附近的胜利是真实的，但这页并不支持把这种行为外推到Flipt feature flag 服务 · release 005，0/10（0.0%）。38/453 的单次尝试成功数绝对值不高，但稳定子集足够成形，值得和失败面分开看。
支撑这个判断的 suite 表
| Suite | Repo | 解出 | Pass^3 | 通过率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
release-zh-003-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 4/10 | 4 | 40.0% |
release-zh-007-flipt-io-flipt |
flipt-io/flipt | 4/10 | 2 | 40.0% |
release-zh-004-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 1/3 | 1 | 33.3% |
release-zh-001-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 2/10 | 1 | 20.0% |
release-zh-016-internetarchive-openlibrary |
internetarchive/openlibrary | 1/5 | 1 | 20.0% |
release-zh-002-ansible-ansible |
ansible/ansible | 1/10 | 1 | 10.0% |
release-zh-005-flipt-io-flipt |
flipt-io/flipt | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-008-flipt-io-flipt |
flipt-io/flipt | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-010-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |
release-zh-011-future-architect-vuls |
future-architect/vuls | 0/10 | 0 | 0.0% |